ResearchTrend.AI
  • Papers
  • Communities
  • Events
  • Blog
  • Pricing
Papers
Communities
Social Events
Terms and Conditions
Pricing
Parameter LabParameter LabTwitterGitHubLinkedInBlueskyYoutube

© 2025 ResearchTrend.AI, All rights reserved.

  1. Home
  2. Papers
  3. 2505.11494
7
0

SHIELD: Safety on Humanoids via CBFs In Expectation on Learned Dynamics

16 May 2025
Lizhi Yang
Blake Werner
Ryan K. Cosner
David Fridovich-Keil
Preston Culbertson
Aaron D. Ames
ArXivPDFHTML
Abstract

Robot learning has produced remarkably effective ``black-box'' controllers for complex tasks such as dynamic locomotion on humanoids. Yet ensuring dynamic safety, i.e., constraint satisfaction, remains challenging for such policies. Reinforcement learning (RL) embeds constraints heuristically through reward engineering, and adding or modifying constraints requires retraining. Model-based approaches, like control barrier functions (CBFs), enable runtime constraint specification with formal guarantees but require accurate dynamics models. This paper presents SHIELD, a layered safety framework that bridges this gap by: (1) training a generative, stochastic dynamics residual model using real-world data from hardware rollouts of the nominal controller, capturing system behavior and uncertainties; and (2) adding a safety layer on top of the nominal (learned locomotion) controller that leverages this model via a stochastic discrete-time CBF formulation enforcing safety constraints in probability. The result is a minimally-invasive safety layer that can be added to the existing autonomy stack to give probabilistic guarantees of safety that balance risk and performance. In hardware experiments on an Unitree G1 humanoid, SHIELD enables safe navigation (obstacle avoidance) through varied indoor and outdoor environments using a nominal (unknown) RL controller and onboard perception.

View on arXiv
@article{yang2025_2505.11494,
  title={ SHIELD: Safety on Humanoids via CBFs In Expectation on Learned Dynamics },
  author={ Lizhi Yang and Blake Werner and Ryan K. Cosner and David Fridovich-Keil and Preston Culbertson and Aaron D. Ames },
  journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.11494},
  year={ 2025 }
}
Comments on this paper