On the Rigour of Scientific Writing: Criteria, Analysis, and Insights

v1v2 (latest)

On the Rigour of Scientific Writing: Criteria, Analysis, and Insights

7 October 2024

Yucheng Li

Chenghua Lin

ArXiv (abs)PDF HTML

Papers citing "On the Rigour of Scientific Writing: Criteria, Analysis, and Insights"

5 / 5 papers shown

Title
Has the Machine Learning Review Process Become More Arbitrary as the Field Has Grown? The NeurIPS 2021 Consistency Experiment A. Beygelzimer Yann N. Dauphin Percy Liang J. W. Vaughan 60 9 0 05 Jun 2023
GPT-4 Technical Report OpenAI OpenAI OpenAI Josh Achiam Steven Adler Sandhini Agarwal Lama Ahmad ... Shengjia Zhao Tianhao Zheng Juntang Zhuang William Zhuk Barret Zoph LLMAG MLLM 1.5K 14,699 0 15 Mar 2023
Task-aware Retrieval with Instructions Akari Asai Timo Schick Patrick Lewis Xilun Chen Gautier Izacard Sebastian Riedel Hannaneh Hajishirzi Wen-tau Yih 92 96 0 16 Nov 2022
Inconsistency in Conference Peer Review: Revisiting the 2014 NeurIPS Experiment Corinna Cortes Neil D. Lawrence 100 46 0 20 Sep 2021
SciBERT: A Pretrained Language Model for Scientific Text Iz Beltagy Kyle Lo Arman Cohan 163 2,985 0 26 Mar 2019