The four-fifths rule is not disparate impact: a woeful tale of epistemic trespassing in algorithmic fairness

19 February 2022

Papers citing "The four-fifths rule is not disparate impact: a woeful tale of epistemic trespassing in algorithmic fairness"

7 / 7 papers shown

Title
Towards Standardizing AI Bias Exploration Emmanouil Krasanakis Symeon Papadopoulos 38 3 0 29 May 2024
Unlawful Proxy Discrimination: A Framework for Challenging Inherently Discriminatory Algorithms Hilde Weerts Aislinn Kelly-Lyth Reuben Binns Jeremias Adams-Prassl 37 1 0 22 Apr 2024
Fairness Vs. Personalization: Towards Equity in Epistemic Utility Jennifer Chien David Danks FaML 19 3 0 05 Sep 2023
Algorithmic Unfairness through the Lens of EU Non-Discrimination Law: Or Why the Law is not a Decision Tree Hilde J. P. Weerts Raphaële Xenidis Fabien Tarissan Henrik Palmer Olsen Mykola Pechenizkiy FaML 27 21 0 05 May 2023
Fairlearn: Assessing and Improving Fairness of AI Systems Hilde Weerts Miroslav Dudík Richard Edgar Adrin Jalali Roman Lutz Michael Madaio FaML 19 65 0 29 Mar 2023
Lost in Translation: Reimagining the Machine Learning Life Cycle in Education Lydia T. Liu Serena Wang Tolani A. Britton Rediet Abebe AI4Ed 21 1 0 08 Sep 2022
Artificial Concepts of Artificial Intelligence: Institutional Compliance and Resistance in AI Startups Amy A. Winecoff E. A. Watkins 25 17 0 02 Mar 2022