ResearchTrend.AI
  • Papers
  • Communities
  • Events
  • Blog
  • Pricing
Papers
Communities
Social Events
Terms and Conditions
Pricing
Parameter LabParameter LabTwitterGitHubLinkedInBlueskyYoutube

© 2025 ResearchTrend.AI, All rights reserved.

  1. Home
  2. Papers
  3. 2103.16511
31
28

Flatland Competition 2020: MAPF and MARL for Efficient Train Coordination on a Grid World

30 March 2021
Florian Laurent
Manuel Schneider
Christian Scheller
J. Watson
Jiaoyang Li
Zhe Chen
Y. Zheng
Shao-Hung Chan
Konstantin Makhnev
Oleg Svidchenko
Vladimir Egorov
Dmitry Ivanov
A. Shpilman
Evgenija Spirovska
Oliver Tanevski
A. nikov
Ramon Grunder
David Galevski
Jakov Mitrovski
Guillaume Sartoretti
Zhiyao Luo
Mehul Damani
Nilabha Bhattacharya
Shivam Agarwal
A. Egli
Erik Nygren
Sharada Mohanty
ArXivPDFHTML
Abstract

The Flatland competition aimed at finding novel approaches to solve the vehicle re-scheduling problem (VRSP). The VRSP is concerned with scheduling trips in traffic networks and the re-scheduling of vehicles when disruptions occur, for example the breakdown of a vehicle. While solving the VRSP in various settings has been an active area in operations research (OR) for decades, the ever-growing complexity of modern railway networks makes dynamic real-time scheduling of traffic virtually impossible. Recently, multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL) has successfully tackled challenging tasks where many agents need to be coordinated, such as multiplayer video games. However, the coordination of hundreds of agents in a real-life setting like a railway network remains challenging and the Flatland environment used for the competition models these real-world properties in a simplified manner. Submissions had to bring as many trains (agents) to their target stations in as little time as possible. While the best submissions were in the OR category, participants found many promising MARL approaches. Using both centralized and decentralized learning based approaches, top submissions used graph representations of the environment to construct tree-based observations. Further, different coordination mechanisms were implemented, such as communication and prioritization between agents. This paper presents the competition setup, four outstanding solutions to the competition, and a cross-comparison between them.

View on arXiv
Comments on this paper