A Novice-Reviewer Experiment to Address Scarcity of Qualified Reviewers
in Large Conferences

A Novice-Reviewer Experiment to Address Scarcity of Qualified Reviewers in Large Conferences

30 November 2020

Aarti Singh

Papers citing "A Novice-Reviewer Experiment to Address Scarcity of Qualified Reviewers in Large Conferences"

11 / 11 papers shown

Title
Mitigating Manipulation in Peer Review via Randomized Reviewer Assignments Steven Jecmen Hanrui Zhang Ryan Liu Nihar B. Shah Vincent Conitzer Fei Fang 104 70 0 29 Jun 2020
A SUPER* Algorithm to Optimize Paper Bidding in Peer Review Tanner Fiez Nihar B. Shah Lillian J. Ratliff 37 38 0 27 Jun 2020
On Testing for Biases in Peer Review Ivan Stelmakh Nihar B. Shah Aarti Singh 45 47 0 31 Dec 2019
Does My Rebuttal Matter? Insights from a Major NLP Conference Yang Gao Steffen Eger Ilia Kuznetsov Iryna Gurevych Yusuke Miyao 49 64 0 27 Mar 2019
Avoiding a Tragedy of the Commons in the Peer Review Process D. Sculley Jasper Snoek Alexander B. Wiltschko 63 21 0 18 Dec 2018
Loss Functions, Axioms, and Peer Review Ritesh Noothigattu Nihar B. Shah Ariel D. Procaccia 47 42 0 27 Aug 2018
PeerReview4All: Fair and Accurate Reviewer Assignment in Peer Review Ivan Stelmakh Nihar B. Shah Aarti Singh 37 97 0 16 Jun 2018
Your 2 is My 1, Your 3 is My 9: Handling Arbitrary Miscalibrations in Ratings Jingyan Wang Nihar B. Shah 46 76 0 13 Jun 2018
Design and Analysis of the NIPS 2016 Review Process Nihar B. Shah Behzad Tabibian Krikamol Muandet Isabelle M Guyon U. V. Luxburg BDL 144 100 0 31 Aug 2017
The Conference Paper Assignment Problem: Using Order Weighted Averages to Assign Indivisible Goods Jinguo Lian Nicholas Mattei Renee Noble T. Walsh 47 61 0 19 May 2017
Breaking Monotony with Meaning: Motivation in Crowdsourcing Markets D. Chandler A. Kapelner 122 422 0 03 Oct 2012