Does My Rebuttal Matter? Insights from a Major NLP Conference

Does My Rebuttal Matter? Insights from a Major NLP Conference

27 March 2019

Ilia Kuznetsov

Papers citing "Does My Rebuttal Matter? Insights from a Major NLP Conference"

8 / 8 papers shown

Title
Are the confidence scores of reviewers consistent with the review content? Evidence from top conference proceedings in AI Wenqing Wu Haixu Xi Chengzhi Zhang 17 5 0 21 May 2025
Position: The AI Conference Peer Review Crisis Demands Author Feedback and Reviewer Rewards Jaeho Kim Yunseok Lee Seulki Lee 41 0 0 08 May 2025
NLLG Quarterly arXiv Report 06/23: What are the most influential current AI Papers? Steffen Eger Christoph Leiter Jonas Belouadi Ran Zhang Aida Kostikova Daniil Larionov Yanran Chen Vivian Fresen AI4CE 37 4 0 31 Jul 2023
MOPRD: A multidisciplinary open peer review dataset Jialiang Lin Jiaxin Song Zhangping Zhou Yidong Chen X. Shi 33 12 0 09 Dec 2022
Investigating Fairness Disparities in Peer Review: A Language Model Enhanced Approach Jiayao Zhang Hongming Zhang Zhun Deng Dan Roth 48 14 0 07 Nov 2022
DISAPERE: A Dataset for Discourse Structure in Peer Review Discussions Neha Nayak Kennard Timothy J. O'Gorman Rajarshi Das Akshay Sharma Chhandak Bagchi Matthew Clinton Pranay Kumar Yelugam Hamed Zamani Andrew McCallum 48 28 0 16 Oct 2021
Can We Automate Scientific Reviewing? Weizhe Yuan Pengfei Liu Graham Neubig 88 84 0 30 Jan 2021
On Strategyproof Conference Peer Review Yichong Xu Haiying Zhao Xiaofei Shi Jeremy Zhang Nihar B. Shah 25 49 0 16 Jun 2018