ResearchTrend.AI
  • Papers
  • Communities
  • Events
  • Blog
  • Pricing
Papers
Communities
Social Events
Terms and Conditions
Pricing
Parameter LabParameter LabTwitterGitHubLinkedInBlueskyYoutube

© 2025 ResearchTrend.AI, All rights reserved.

  1. Home
  2. Papers
  3. 1708.09085
  4. Cited By
Argument Strength is in the Eye of the Beholder: Audience Effects in
  Persuasion

Argument Strength is in the Eye of the Beholder: Audience Effects in Persuasion

30 August 2017
S. Lukin
P. Anand
M. Walker
S. Whittaker
ArXivPDFHTML

Papers citing "Argument Strength is in the Eye of the Beholder: Audience Effects in Persuasion"

14 / 14 papers shown
Title
Communication is All You Need: Persuasion Dataset Construction via Multi-LLM Communication
Communication is All You Need: Persuasion Dataset Construction via Multi-LLM Communication
Weicheng Ma
Hefan Zhang
Ivory Yang
Shiyu Ji
Joice Chen
...
Shubham Mohole
Ethan Gearey
Michael Macy
Saeed Hassanpour
Soroush Vosoughi
85
2
0
13 Feb 2025
Fearful Falcons and Angry Llamas: Emotion Category Annotations of Arguments by Humans and LLMs
Fearful Falcons and Angry Llamas: Emotion Category Annotations of Arguments by Humans and LLMs
Lynn Greschner
Roman Klinger
130
2
0
20 Dec 2024
Hatred Stems from Ignorance! Distillation of the Persuasion Modes in Countering Conversational Hate Speech
Hatred Stems from Ignorance! Distillation of the Persuasion Modes in Countering Conversational Hate Speech
Ghadi Alyahya
Abeer Aldayel
62
2
0
18 Mar 2024
What Gets Echoed? Understanding the "Pointers" in Explanations of
  Persuasive Arguments
What Gets Echoed? Understanding the "Pointers" in Explanations of Persuasive Arguments
D. Atkinson
K. Srinivasan
Chenhao Tan
66
16
0
01 Nov 2019
Creating and Characterizing a Diverse Corpus of Sarcasm in Dialogue
Creating and Characterizing a Diverse Corpus of Sarcasm in Dialogue
Shereen Oraby
Vrindavan Harrison
Lena Reed
Ernesto Hernandez
E. Riloff
M. Walker
39
116
0
15 Sep 2017
And That's A Fact: Distinguishing Factual and Emotional Argumentation in
  Online Dialogue
And That's A Fact: Distinguishing Factual and Emotional Argumentation in Online Dialogue
Shereen Oraby
Lena Reed
Ryan Compton
E. Riloff
M. Walker
S. Whittaker
42
63
0
15 Sep 2017
Measuring the Similarity of Sentential Arguments in Dialog
Measuring the Similarity of Sentential Arguments in Dialog
Amita Misra
B. Ecker
M. Walker
86
62
0
06 Sep 2017
Getting Reliable Annotations for Sarcasm in Online Dialogues
Getting Reliable Annotations for Sarcasm in Online Dialogues
Reid Swanson
S. Lukin
Luke Eisenberg
T. Corcoran
M. Walker
30
18
0
04 Sep 2017
A Semi-Supervised Approach to Detecting Stance in Tweets
A Semi-Supervised Approach to Detecting Stance in Tweets
Amita Misra
B. Ecker
Theodore Handleman
Nicolas Hahn
M. Walker
29
22
0
03 Sep 2017
Topic Independent Identification of Agreement and Disagreement in Social
  Media Dialogue
Topic Independent Identification of Agreement and Disagreement in Social Media Dialogue
Amita Misra
M. Walker
30
59
0
03 Sep 2017
Learning Fine-Grained Knowledge about Contingent Relations between
  Everyday Events
Learning Fine-Grained Knowledge about Contingent Relations between Everyday Events
Elahe Rahimtoroghi
Ernesto Hernandez
M. Walker
BDL
NAI
27
14
0
30 Aug 2017
Really? Well. Apparently Bootstrapping Improves the Performance of
  Sarcasm and Nastiness Classifiers for Online Dialogue
Really? Well. Apparently Bootstrapping Improves the Performance of Sarcasm and Nastiness Classifiers for Online Dialogue
S. Lukin
M. Walker
32
89
0
29 Aug 2017
Learning Latent Local Conversation Modes for Predicting Community
  Endorsement in Online Discussions
Learning Latent Local Conversation Modes for Predicting Community Endorsement in Online Discussions
Hao Fang
Hao Cheng
Mari Ostendorf
58
15
0
16 Aug 2016
Winning Arguments: Interaction Dynamics and Persuasion Strategies in
  Good-faith Online Discussions
Winning Arguments: Interaction Dynamics and Persuasion Strategies in Good-faith Online Discussions
Chenhao Tan
Vlad Niculae
Cristian Danescu-Niculescu-Mizil
Lillian Lee
70
359
0
02 Feb 2016
1