ResearchTrend.AI
Fairer and more accurate, but for whom?

Fairer and more accurate, but for whom?

Alexandra Chouldechova
M. G'Sell
ArXivPDFHTML

Papers citing "Fairer and more accurate, but for whom?"

5 / 5 papers shown
Title
Fairness in Criminal Justice Risk Assessments: The State of the Art
Fairness in Criminal Justice Risk Assessments: The State of the Art
R. Berk
Hoda Heidari
S. Jabbari
Michael Kearns
Aaron Roth
38
990
0
27 Mar 2017
Identifying Significant Predictive Bias in Classifiers
Identifying Significant Predictive Bias in Classifiers
Zhe Zhang
Daniel B. Neill
40
63
0
24 Nov 2016
Fair prediction with disparate impact: A study of bias in recidivism prediction instruments
Fair prediction with disparate impact: A study of bias in recidivism prediction instruments
Alexandra Chouldechova
FaML
285
2,098
0
24 Oct 2016
Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learning
Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learning
Moritz Hardt
Eric Price
Nathan Srebro
FaML
105
4,276
0
07 Oct 2016
Inherent Trade-Offs in the Fair Determination of Risk Scores
Inherent Trade-Offs in the Fair Determination of Risk Scores
Jon M. Kleinberg
S. Mullainathan
Manish Raghavan
FaML
79
1,762
0
19 Sep 2016