ResearchTrend.AI
  • Papers
  • Communities
  • Events
  • Blog
  • Pricing
Papers
Communities
Social Events
Terms and Conditions
Pricing
Parameter LabParameter LabTwitterGitHubLinkedInBlueskyYoutube

© 2025 ResearchTrend.AI, All rights reserved.

  1. Home
  2. Papers
  3. 1703.04381
14
37

On the Transformation Capability of Feasible Mechanisms for Programmable Matter

13 March 2017
O. Michail
George Skretas
P. Spirakis
ArXivPDFHTML
Abstract

In this work, we study theoretical models of \emph{programmable matter} systems. The systems under consideration consist of spherical modules, kept together by magnetic forces and able to perform two minimal mechanical operations (or movements): \emph{rotate} around a neighbor and \emph{slide} over a line. In terms of modeling, there are nnn nodes arranged in a 2-dimensional grid and forming some initial \emph{shape}. The goal is for the initial shape AAA to \emph{transform} to some target shape BBB by a sequence of movements. Most of the paper focuses on \emph{transformability} questions, meaning whether it is in principle feasible to transform a given shape to another. We first consider the case in which only rotation is available to the nodes. Our main result is that deciding whether two given shapes AAA and BBB can be transformed to each other, is in P\mathbf{P}P. We then insist on rotation only and impose the restriction that the nodes must maintain global connectivity throughout the transformation. We prove that the corresponding transformability question is in PSPACE\mathbf{PSPACE}PSPACE and study the problem of determining the minimum \emph{seeds} that can make feasible, otherwise infeasible transformations. Next we allow both rotations and slidings and prove universality: any two connected shapes A,BA,BA,B of the same order, can be transformed to each other without breaking connectivity. The worst-case number of movements of the generic strategy is Ω(n2)\Omega(n^2)Ω(n2). We improve this to O(n)O(n)O(n) parallel time, by a pipelining strategy, and prove optimality of both by matching lower bounds. In the last part of the paper, we turn our attention to distributed transformations. The nodes are now distributed processes able to perform communicate-compute-move rounds. We provide distributed algorithms for a general type of transformations.

View on arXiv
Comments on this paper