ResearchTrend.AI
  • Papers
  • Communities
  • Events
  • Blog
  • Pricing
Papers
Communities
Social Events
Terms and Conditions
Pricing
Parameter LabParameter LabTwitterGitHubLinkedInBlueskyYoutube

© 2025 ResearchTrend.AI, All rights reserved.

  1. Home
  2. Papers
  3. 2506.15224
5
0

Facility Location Problem under Local Differential Privacy without Super-set Assumption

18 June 2025
Kevin Pfisterer
Quentin Hillebrand
Vorapong Suppakitpaisarn
ArXiv (abs)PDFHTML
Main:22 Pages
8 Figures
Bibliography:1 Pages
Abstract

In this paper, we introduce an adaptation of the facility location problem and analyze it within the framework of local differential privacy (LDP). Under this model, we ensure the privacy of client presence at specific locations. When n is the number of points, Gupta et al. established a lower bound of Ω(n)\Omega(\sqrt{n})Ω(n​) on the approximation ratio for any differentially private algorithm applied to the original facility location problem. As a result, subsequent works have adopted the super-set assumption, which may, however, compromise user privacy. We show that this lower bound does not apply to our adaptation by presenting an LDP algorithm that achieves a constant approximation ratio with a relatively small additive factor. Additionally, we provide experimental results demonstrating that our algorithm outperforms the straightforward approach on both synthetically generated and real-world datasets.

View on arXiv
@article{pfisterer2025_2506.15224,
  title={ Facility Location Problem under Local Differential Privacy without Super-set Assumption },
  author={ Kevin Pfisterer and Quentin Hillebrand and Vorapong Suppakitpaisarn },
  journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.15224},
  year={ 2025 }
}
Comments on this paper