ResearchTrend.AI
  • Papers
  • Communities
  • Events
  • Blog
  • Pricing
Papers
Communities
Social Events
Terms and Conditions
Pricing
Parameter LabParameter LabTwitterGitHubLinkedInBlueskyYoutube

© 2025 ResearchTrend.AI, All rights reserved.

  1. Home
  2. Papers
  3. 2506.14437
7
0

Similarity = Value? Consultation Value Assessment and Alignment for Personalized Search

17 June 2025
Weicong Qin
Yi Xu
Weijie Yu
Teng Shi
Chenglei Shen
Ming He
Jianping Fan
Xiao Zhang
Jun Xu
ArXiv (abs)PDFHTML
Main:8 Pages
8 Figures
Bibliography:3 Pages
5 Tables
Appendix:3 Pages
Abstract

Personalized search systems in e-commerce platforms increasingly involve user interactions with AI assistants, where users consult about products, usage scenarios, and more. Leveraging consultation to personalize search services is trending. Existing methods typically rely on semantic similarity to align historical consultations with current queries due to the absence of 'value' labels, but we observe that semantic similarity alone often fails to capture the true value of consultation for personalization. To address this, we propose a consultation value assessment framework that evaluates historical consultations from three novel perspectives: (1) Scenario Scope Value, (2) Posterior Action Value, and (3) Time Decay Value. Based on this, we introduce VAPS, a value-aware personalized search model that selectively incorporates high-value consultations through a consultation-user action interaction module and an explicit objective that aligns consultations with user actions. Experiments on both public and commercial datasets show that VAPS consistently outperforms baselines in both retrieval and ranking tasks.

View on arXiv
@article{qin2025_2506.14437,
  title={ Similarity = Value? Consultation Value Assessment and Alignment for Personalized Search },
  author={ Weicong Qin and Yi Xu and Weijie Yu and Teng Shi and Chenglei Shen and Ming He and Jianping Fan and Xiao Zhang and Jun Xu },
  journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.14437},
  year={ 2025 }
}
Comments on this paper