A Comparative Study on Proactive and Passive Detection of Deepfake Speech

Solutions for defending against deepfake speech fall into two categories: proactive watermarking models and passive conventional deepfake detectors. While both address common threats, their differences in training, optimization, and evaluation prevent a unified protocol for joint evaluation and selecting the best solutions for different cases. This work proposes a framework to evaluate both model types in deepfake speech detection. To ensure fair comparison and minimize discrepancies, all models were trained and tested on common datasets, with performance evaluated using a shared metric. We also analyze their robustness against various adversarial attacks, showing that different models exhibit distinct vulnerabilities to different speech attribute distortions. Our training and evaluation code is available at Github.

@article{wu2025_2506.14398,
  title={ A Comparative Study on Proactive and Passive Detection of Deepfake Speech },
  author={ Chia-Hua Wu and Wanying Ge and Xin Wang and Junichi Yamagishi and Yu Tsao and Hsin-Min Wang },
  journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.14398},
  year={ 2025 }
}