7
0

Students' Reliance on AI in Higher Education: Identifying Contributing Factors

Main:9 Pages
2 Figures
Bibliography:2 Pages
Abstract

The increasing availability and use of artificial intelligence (AI) tools in educational settings has raised concerns about students' overreliance on these technologies. Overreliance occurs when individuals accept incorrect AI-generated recommendations, often without critical evaluation, leading to flawed problem solutions and undermining learning outcomes. This study investigates potential factors contributing to patterns of AI reliance among undergraduate students, examining not only overreliance but also appropriate reliance (correctly accepting helpful and rejecting harmful recommendations) and underreliance (incorrectly rejecting helpful recommendations). Our approach combined pre- and post-surveys with a controlled experimental task where participants solved programming problems with an AI assistant that provided both accurate and deliberately incorrect suggestions, allowing direct observation of students' reliance patterns when faced with varying AI reliability. We find that appropriate reliance is significantly related to students' programming self-efficacy, programming literacy, and need for cognition, while showing negative correlations with post-task trust and satisfaction. Overreliance showed significant correlations with post-task trust and satisfaction with the AI assistant. Underreliance was negatively correlated with programming literacy, programming self-efficacy, and need for cognition. Overall, the findings provide insights for developing targeted interventions that promote appropriate reliance on AI tools, with implications for the integration of AI in curriculum and educational technologies.

View on arXiv
@article{pitts2025_2506.13845,
  title={ Students' Reliance on AI in Higher Education: Identifying Contributing Factors },
  author={ Griffin Pitts and Neha Rani and Weedguet Mildort and Eva-Marie Cook },
  journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.13845},
  year={ 2025 }
}
Comments on this paper