59
0
v1v2 (latest)

VM14K: First Vietnamese Medical Benchmark

Main:9 Pages
7 Figures
Bibliography:3 Pages
7 Tables
Appendix:2 Pages
Abstract

Medical benchmarks are indispensable for evaluating the capabilities of language models in healthcare for non-English-speaking communities,therefore help ensuring the quality of real-life applications. However, not every community has sufficient resources and standardized methods to effectively build and design such benchmark, and available non-English medical data is normally fragmented and difficult to verify. We developed an approach to tackle this problem and applied it to create the first Vietnamese medical question benchmark, featuring 14,000 multiple-choice questions across 34 medical specialties. Our benchmark was constructed using various verifiable sources, including carefully curated medical exams and clinical records, and eventually annotated by medical experts. The benchmark includes four difficulty levels, ranging from foundational biological knowledge commonly found in textbooks to typical clinical case studies that require advanced reasoning. This design enables assessment of both the breadth and depth of language models' medical understanding in the target language thanks to its extensive coverage and in-depth subject-specific expertise. We release the benchmark in three parts: a sample public set (4k questions), a full public set (10k questions), and a private set (2k questions) used for leaderboard evaluation. Each set contains all medical subfields and difficulty levels. Our approach is scalable to other languages, and we open-source our data construction pipeline to support the development of future multilingual benchmarks in the medical domain.

View on arXiv
@article{nguyen2025_2506.01305,
  title={ VM14K: First Vietnamese Medical Benchmark },
  author={ Thong Nguyen and Duc Nguyen and Minh Dang and Thai Dao and Long Nguyen and Quan H. Nguyen and Dat Nguyen and Kien Tran and Minh Tran },
  journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.01305},
  year={ 2025 }
}
Comments on this paper