ResearchTrend.AI
  • Papers
  • Communities
  • Events
  • Blog
  • Pricing
Papers
Communities
Social Events
Terms and Conditions
Pricing
Parameter LabParameter LabTwitterGitHubLinkedInBlueskyYoutube

© 2025 ResearchTrend.AI, All rights reserved.

  1. Home
  2. Papers
  3. 2506.00249
29
0

MIR: Methodology Inspiration Retrieval for Scientific Research Problems

30 May 2025
Aniketh Garikaparthi
Manasi Patwardhan
Aditya Sanjiv Kanade
Aman Hassan
Lovekesh Vig
Arman Cohan
    OffRLRALMLRM
ArXiv (abs)PDFHTML
Main:9 Pages
3 Figures
Bibliography:4 Pages
13 Tables
Appendix:33 Pages
Abstract

There has been a surge of interest in harnessing the reasoning capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs) to accelerate scientific discovery. While existing approaches rely on grounding the discovery process within the relevant literature, effectiveness varies significantly with the quality and nature of the retrieved literature. We address the challenge of retrieving prior work whose concepts can inspire solutions for a given research problem, a task we define as Methodology Inspiration Retrieval (MIR). We construct a novel dataset tailored for training and evaluating retrievers on MIR, and establish baselines. To address MIR, we build the Methodology Adjacency Graph (MAG); capturing methodological lineage through citation relationships. We leverage MAG to embed an "intuitive prior" into dense retrievers for identifying patterns of methodological inspiration beyond superficial semantic similarity. This achieves significant gains of +5.4 in Recall@3 and +7.8 in Mean Average Precision (mAP) over strong baselines. Further, we adapt LLM-based re-ranking strategies to MIR, yielding additional improvements of +4.5 in Recall@3 and +4.8 in mAP. Through extensive ablation studies and qualitative analyses, we exhibit the promise of MIR in enhancing automated scientific discovery and outline avenues for advancing inspiration-driven retrieval.

View on arXiv
@article{garikaparthi2025_2506.00249,
  title={ MIR: Methodology Inspiration Retrieval for Scientific Research Problems },
  author={ Aniketh Garikaparthi and Manasi Patwardhan and Aditya Sanjiv Kanade and Aman Hassan and Lovekesh Vig and Arman Cohan },
  journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.00249},
  year={ 2025 }
}
Comments on this paper