Large reasoning models such as OpenAI o1 and DeepSeek-R1 have achieved remarkable performance in the domain of reasoning. A key component of their training is the incorporation of verifiable rewards within reinforcement learning (RL). However, existing reward benchmarks do not evaluate reference-based reward systems, leaving researchers with limited understanding of the accuracy of verifiers used in RL. In this paper, we introduce two benchmarks, VerifyBench and VerifyBench-Hard, designed to assess the performance of reference-based reward systems. These benchmarks are constructed through meticulous data collection and curation, followed by careful human annotation to ensure high quality. Current models still show considerable room for improvement on both VerifyBench and VerifyBench-Hard, especially smaller-scale models. Furthermore, we conduct a thorough and comprehensive analysis of evaluation results, offering insights for understanding and developing reference-based reward systems. Our proposed benchmarks serve as effective tools for guiding the development of verifier accuracy and the reasoning capabilities of models trained via RL in reasoning tasks.
View on arXiv@article{yan2025_2505.15801,
title={ VerifyBench: Benchmarking Reference-based Reward Systems for Large Language Models },
author={ Yuchen Yan and Jin Jiang and Zhenbang Ren and Yijun Li and Xudong Cai and Yang Liu and Xin Xu and Mengdi Zhang and Jian Shao and Yongliang Shen and Jun Xiao and Yueting Zhuang },
journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.15801},
year={ 2025 }
}