ResearchTrend.AI
  • Papers
  • Communities
  • Events
  • Blog
  • Pricing
Papers
Communities
Social Events
Terms and Conditions
Pricing
Parameter LabParameter LabTwitterGitHubLinkedInBlueskyYoutube

© 2025 ResearchTrend.AI, All rights reserved.

  1. Home
  2. Papers
  3. 2504.12218
33
0

Accountable Liveness

16 April 2025
Andrew Lewis-Pye
Joachim Neu
Tim Roughgarden
Luca Zanolini
ArXivPDFHTML
Abstract

Safety and liveness are the two classical security properties of consensus protocols. Recent works have strengthened safety with accountability: should any safety violation occur, a sizable fraction of adversary nodes can be proven to be protocol violators. This paper studies to what extent analogous accountability guarantees are achievable for liveness. To reveal the full complexity of this question, we introduce an interpolation between the classical synchronous and partially-synchronous models that we call the xxx-partially-synchronous network model in which, intuitively, at most an xxx fraction of the time steps in any sufficiently long interval are asynchronous (and, as with a partially-synchronous network, all time steps are synchronous following the passage of an unknown "global stablization time"). We prove a precise characterization of the parameter regime in which accountable liveness is achievable: if and only if x<1/2x < 1/2x<1/2 and f<n/2f < n/2f<n/2, where nnn denotes the number of nodes and fff the number of nodes controlled by an adversary. We further refine the problem statement and our analysis by parameterizing by the number of violating nodes identified following a liveness violation, and provide evidence that the guarantees achieved by our protocol are near-optimal (as a function of xxx and fff). Our results provide rigorous foundations for liveness-accountability heuristics such as the "inactivity leaks" employed in Ethereum.

View on arXiv
@article{lewis-pye2025_2504.12218,
  title={ Accountable Liveness },
  author={ Andrew Lewis-Pye and Joachim Neu and Tim Roughgarden and Luca Zanolini },
  journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.12218},
  year={ 2025 }
}
Comments on this paper