ResearchTrend.AI
  • Papers
  • Communities
  • Events
  • Blog
  • Pricing
Papers
Communities
Social Events
Terms and Conditions
Pricing
Parameter LabParameter LabTwitterGitHubLinkedInBlueskyYoutube

© 2025 ResearchTrend.AI, All rights reserved.

  1. Home
  2. Papers
  3. 2504.08757
28
0

A Framework for Lightweight Responsible Prompting Recommendation

29 March 2025
Tiago Machado
Sara E. Berger
Cassia Sanctos
Vagner Figueiredo de Santana
Lemara Williams
Zhaoqing Wu
ArXivPDFHTML
Abstract

Computer Science and Design practitioners have been researching and proposing alternatives for a dearth of recommendations, standards, or best practices in user interfaces for decades. Now, with the advent of generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI), we have yet again an emerging, powerful technology that lacks sufficient guidance in terms of possible interactions, inputs, and outcomes. In this context, this work proposes a lightweight framework for responsible prompting recommendation to be added before the prompt is sent to GenAI. The framework is comprised of (1) a human-curated dataset for recommendations, (2) a red team dataset for assessing recommendations, (3) a sentence transformer for semantics mapping, (4) a similarity metric to map input prompt to recommendations, (5) a set of similarity thresholds, (6) quantized sentence embeddings, (7) a recommendation engine, and (8) an evaluation step to use the red team dataset. With the proposed framework and open-source system, the contributions presented can be applied in multiple contexts where end-users can benefit from guidance for interacting with GenAI in a more responsible way, recommending positive values to be added and harmful sentences to be removed.

View on arXiv
@article{machado2025_2504.08757,
  title={ A Framework for Lightweight Responsible Prompting Recommendation },
  author={ Tiago Machado and Sara E. Berger and Cassia Sanctos and Vagner Figueiredo de Santana and Lemara Williams and Zhaoqing Wu },
  journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.08757},
  year={ 2025 }
}
Comments on this paper