Many blockchain-based decentralized services require their validators (operators) to deposit stake (collateral), which is forfeited (slashed) if they misbehave. Restaking networks let validators secure multiple services by reusing stake. These networks have quickly gained traction, leveraging over~\20billioninstake.However,restakingintroducesanewattackvectorwherevalidatorscancoordinatetomisbehaveacrossmultipleservicessimultaneously,extractingdigitalassetswhileforfeitingtheirstakeonlyonce.PreviousworkfocusedeitheronpreventingcoordinatedmisbehaviororonprotectingservicesifallotherservicesareByzantineandmightunjustlycauseslashingduetobugsormalice.ThefirstmodeloverlookshowasingleByzantineservicecancollapsethenetwork,whilethesecondignoresshared−stakebenefits.Tobridgethegap,weanalyzethesystemasastrategicgameofcoordinatedmisbehavior,whenagivenfractionoftheservicesareByzantine.Weintroduceelasticrestakingnetworks,wherevalidatorscanallocateportionsoftheirstakethatmaycumulativelyexceedtheirtotalstake,andwhenallocationsarelost,theremainingstakestretchestocoverremainingallocations.Weshowthatelasticnetworksexhibitsuperiorrobustnesscomparedtopreviousapproaches,anddemonstrateasynergisticeffectwhereanelasticrestakingnetworkenhancesitsblockchain′ssecurity,contrarytocommunityconcernsofanoppositeeffectinexistingnetworks.Wethendesignincentivesfortuningvalidators′allocations.Ourelasticrestakingsystemandincentivedesignhaveimmediatepracticalimplicationsfordeployedrestakingnetworks.