Assessing Autonomous Inspection Regimes: Active Versus Passive Satellite Inspection

This paper addresses the problem of satellite inspection, where one or more satellites (inspectors) are tasked with imaging or inspecting a resident space object (RSO) due to potential malfunctions or anomalies. Inspection strategies are often reduced to a discretized action space with predefined waypoints, facilitating tractability in both classical optimization and machine learning based approaches. However, this discretization can lead to suboptimal guidance in certain scenarios. This study presents a comparative simulation to explore the tradeoffs of passive versus active strategies in multi-agent missions. Key factors considered include RSO dynamic mode, state uncertainty, unmodeled entrance criteria, and inspector motion types. The evaluation is conducted with a focus on fuel utilization and surface coverage. Building on a Monte-Carlo based evaluator of passive strategies and a reinforcement learning framework for training active inspection policies, this study investigates conditions under which passive strategies, such as Natural Motion Circumnavigation (NMC), may perform comparably to active strategies like Reinforcement Learning based waypoint transfers.

@article{aurand2025_2502.19556,
  title={ Assessing Autonomous Inspection Regimes: Active Versus Passive Satellite Inspection },
  author={ Joshua Aurand and Christopher Pang and Sina Mokhtar and Henry Lei and Steven Cutlip and Sean Phillips },
  journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.19556},
  year={ 2025 }
}