64
38

Towards an AI co-scientist

Abstract

Scientific discovery relies on scientists generating novel hypotheses that undergo rigorous experimental validation. To augment this process, we introduce an AI co-scientist, a multi-agent system built on Gemini 2.0. The AI co-scientist is intended to help uncover new, original knowledge and to formulate demonstrably novel research hypotheses and proposals, building upon prior evidence and aligned to scientist-provided research objectives and guidance. The system's design incorporates a generate, debate, and evolve approach to hypothesis generation, inspired by the scientific method and accelerated by scaling test-time compute. Key contributions include: (1) a multi-agent architecture with an asynchronous task execution framework for flexible compute scaling; (2) a tournament evolution process for self-improving hypotheses generation. Automated evaluations show continued benefits of test-time compute, improving hypothesis quality. While general purpose, we focus development and validation in three biomedical areas: drug repurposing, novel target discovery, and explaining mechanisms of bacterial evolution and anti-microbial resistance. For drug repurposing, the system proposes candidates with promising validation findings, including candidates for acute myeloid leukemia that show tumor inhibition in vitro at clinically applicable concentrations. For novel target discovery, the AI co-scientist proposed new epigenetic targets for liver fibrosis, validated by anti-fibrotic activity and liver cell regeneration in human hepatic organoids. Finally, the AI co-scientist recapitulated unpublished experimental results via a parallel in silico discovery of a novel gene transfer mechanism in bacterial evolution. These results, detailed in separate, co-timed reports, demonstrate the potential to augment biomedical and scientific discovery and usher an era of AI empowered scientists.

View on arXiv
@article{gottweis2025_2502.18864,
  title={ Towards an AI co-scientist },
  author={ Juraj Gottweis and Wei-Hung Weng and Alexander Daryin and Tao Tu and Anil Palepu and Petar Sirkovic and Artiom Myaskovsky and Felix Weissenberger and Keran Rong and Ryutaro Tanno and Khaled Saab and Dan Popovici and Jacob Blum and Fan Zhang and Katherine Chou and Avinatan Hassidim and Burak Gokturk and Amin Vahdat and Pushmeet Kohli and Yossi Matias and Andrew Carroll and Kavita Kulkarni and Nenad Tomasev and Yuan Guan and Vikram Dhillon and Eeshit Dhaval Vaishnav and Byron Lee and Tiago R D Costa and José R Penadés and Gary Peltz and Yunhan Xu and Annalisa Pawlosky and Alan Karthikesalingam and Vivek Natarajan },
  journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.18864},
  year={ 2025 }
}
Comments on this paper