ST-WebAgentBench: A Benchmark for Evaluating Safety and Trustworthiness in Web Agents

Autonomous web agents solve complex browsing tasks, yet existing benchmarks measure only whether an agent finishes a task, ignoring whether it does so safely or in a way enterprises can trust. To integrate these agents into critical workflows, safety and trustworthiness (ST) are prerequisite conditions for adoption. We introduce \textbf{\textsc{ST-WebAgentBench}}, a configurable and easily extensible suite for evaluating web agent ST across realistic enterprise scenarios. Each of its 222 tasks is paired with ST policies, concise rules that encode constraints, and is scored along six orthogonal dimensions (e.g., user consent, robustness). Beyond raw task success, we propose the \textit{Completion Under Policy} (\textit{CuP}) metric, which credits only completions that respect all applicable policies, and the \textit{Risk Ratio}, which quantifies ST breaches across dimensions. Evaluating three open state-of-the-art agents reveals that their average CuP is less than two-thirds of their nominal completion rate, exposing critical safety gaps. By releasing code, evaluation templates, and a policy-authoring interface, \href{this https URL}{\textsc{ST-WebAgentBench}} provides an actionable first step toward deploying trustworthy web agents at scale.

@article{levy2025_2410.06703,
  title={ ST-WebAgentBench: A Benchmark for Evaluating Safety and Trustworthiness in Web Agents },
  author={ Ido Levy and Ben Wiesel and Sami Marreed and Alon Oved and Avi Yaeli and Segev Shlomov },
  journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.06703},
  year={ 2025 }
}