ResearchTrend.AI
  • Papers
  • Communities
  • Events
  • Blog
  • Pricing
Papers
Communities
Social Events
Terms and Conditions
Pricing
Parameter LabParameter LabTwitterGitHubLinkedInBlueskyYoutube

© 2025 ResearchTrend.AI, All rights reserved.

  1. Home
  2. Papers
  3. 2408.17106
28
1

Dual JPEG Compatibility: a Reliable and Explainable Tool for Image Forensics

30 August 2024
Etienne Levecque
Jan Butora
Patrick Bas
ArXivPDFHTML
Abstract

Given a JPEG pipeline (compression or decompression), this paper demonstrates how to find the antecedent of an 8x8 block. If it exists, the block is considered compatible with the pipeline. For unaltered images, all blocks remain compatible with the original pipeline; however, for manipulated images, this is not necessarily true. This article provides a first demonstration of the potential of compatibility-based approaches for JPEG image forensics. It introduces a method to address the key challenge of finding a block antecedent in a high-dimensional space, relying on a local search algorithm with restrictions on the search space. We show that inpainting, copy-move, and splicing, when applied after JPEG compression, result in three distinct mismatch problems that can be detected. In particular, if the image is re-compressed after modification, the manipulation can be detected when the quality factor of the second compression is higher than that of the first. Through extensive experiments, we highlight the potential of this compatibility attack under varying degrees of assumptions. While our approach shows promising results-outperforming three state-of-the-art deep learning models in an idealized setting-it remains a proof of concept rather than an off-the-shelf forensic tool. Notably, with a perfect knowledge of the JPEG pipeline, our method guarantees zero false alarms in block-by-block localization, given sufficient computational power.

View on arXiv
@article{levecque2025_2408.17106,
  title={ Dual JPEG Compatibility: a Reliable and Explainable Tool for Image Forensics },
  author={ Etienne Levecque and Jan Butora and Patrick Bas },
  journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.17106},
  year={ 2025 }
}
Comments on this paper