Given pedestrians' vulnerability in road traffic, it remains unclear how novel AV appearances will impact pedestrians crossing behaviour. To address this gap, this study pioneers an investigation into the influence of AVs' exterior design, correlated with their kinematics, on pedestrians' road-crossing perception and decision-making. A video-based eye-tracking experimental study was conducted with 61 participants who responded to video stimuli depicting a manipulated vehicle approaching a predefined road-crossing location on an unsignalized, two-way road. The vehicle's kinematic pattern was manipulated into yielding and non-yielding, and its external appearances were varied across five types: with a human driver (as a conventional vehicle), with no driver (as an AV), with text-based identity indications, with roof radar sensors, with dynamic eHMIs adjusted to vehicle kinematics. Participants' perceived clarity, crossing initiation distance (CID), crossing decision time (CDT), and gaze behaviour, during interactions were recorded and reported. The results indicated that AVs' kinematic profiles play a dominant role in pedestrians' road-crossing decisions, supported by their subjective evaluations, CID, CDT, and gaze patterns during interactions. Moreover, the use of clear eHMI, such as dynamic pedestrian icons, reduced pedestrians' visual load, enhanced their perceptual clarity, expedited road-crossing decisions, and thereby improved overall crossing efficiency. However, it was found that both textual identity indications and roof radar sensors have no significant effect on pedestrians' decisions but negatively impact pedestrians' visual attention, as evidenced by heightened fixation counts and prolonged fixation durations, particularly under yielding conditions. Excessive visual and cognitive resource occupation suggests that not all explicit cues facilitate human-vehicle communication.
View on arXiv