ResearchTrend.AI
  • Communities
  • Connect sessions
  • AI calendar
  • Organizations
  • Join Slack
  • Contact Sales
Papers
Communities
Social Events
Terms and Conditions
Pricing
Contact Sales
Parameter LabParameter LabTwitterGitHubLinkedInBlueskyYoutube

© 2025 ResearchTrend.AI, All rights reserved.

  1. Home
  2. Papers
  3. 2404.12147
120
0

Faster Optimization Through Genetic Drift

18 April 2024
Cella Florescu
Marc Kaufmann
Johannes Lengler
Ulysse Schaller
ArXiv (abs)PDFHTML
Abstract

The compact Genetic Algorithm (cGA), parameterized by its hypothetical population size KKK, offers a low-memory alternative to evolving a large offspring population of solutions. It evolves a probability distribution, biasing it towards promising samples. For the classical benchmark OneMax, the cGA has to two different modes of operation: a conservative one with small step sizes Θ(1/(nlog⁡n))\Theta(1/(\sqrt{n}\log n))Θ(1/(n​logn)), which is slow but prevents genetic drift, and an aggressive one with large step sizes Θ(1/log⁡n)\Theta(1/\log n)Θ(1/logn), in which genetic drift leads to wrong decisions, but those are corrected efficiently. On OneMax, an easy hill-climbing problem, both modes lead to optimization times of Θ(nlog⁡n)\Theta(n\log n)Θ(nlogn) and are thus equally efficient. In this paper we study how both regimes change when we replace OneMax by the harder hill-climbing problem DynamicBinVal. It turns out that the aggressive mode is not affected and still yields quasi-linear runtime O(n⋅polylog(n))O(n\cdot polylog (n))O(n⋅polylog(n)). However, the conservative mode becomes substantially slower, yielding a runtime of Ω(n2)\Omega(n^2)Ω(n2), since genetic drift can only be avoided with smaller step sizes of O(1/n)O(1/n)O(1/n). We complement our theoretical results with simulations.

View on arXiv
Comments on this paper