ResearchTrend.AI
  • Papers
  • Communities
  • Events
  • Blog
  • Pricing
Papers
Communities
Social Events
Terms and Conditions
Pricing
Parameter LabParameter LabTwitterGitHubLinkedInBlueskyYoutube

© 2025 ResearchTrend.AI, All rights reserved.

  1. Home
  2. Papers
  3. 2404.11784
27
0

Analysis of Evolutionary Diversity Optimisation for the Maximum Matching Problem

17 April 2024
Jonathan Gadea Harder
Aneta Neumann
Frank Neumann
ArXivPDFHTML
Abstract

This paper explores the enhancement of solution diversity in evolutionary algorithms (EAs) for the maximum matching problem, concentrating on complete bipartite graphs and paths. We adopt binary string encoding for matchings and use Hamming distance to measure diversity, aiming for its maximization. Our study centers on the (μ+1)(\mu+1)(μ+1)-EA and 2P−EAD2P-EA_D2P−EAD​, which are applied to optimize diversity. We provide a rigorous theoretical and empirical analysis of these algorithms. For complete bipartite graphs, our runtime analysis shows that, with a reasonably small μ\muμ, the (μ+1)(\mu+1)(μ+1)-EA achieves maximal diversity with an expected runtime of O(μ2m4log⁡(m))O(\mu^2 m^4 \log(m))O(μ2m4log(m)) for the small gap case (where the population size μ\muμ is less than the difference in the sizes of the bipartite partitions) and O(μ2m2log⁡(m))O(\mu^2 m^2 \log(m))O(μ2m2log(m)) otherwise. For paths, we establish an upper runtime bound of O(μ3m3)O(\mu^3 m^3)O(μ3m3). The 2P−EAD2P-EA_D2P−EAD​ displays stronger performance, with bounds of O(μ2m2log⁡(m))O(\mu^2 m^2 \log(m))O(μ2m2log(m)) for the small gap case, O(μ2n2log⁡(n))O(\mu^2 n^2 \log(n))O(μ2n2log(n)) otherwise, and O(μ3m2)O(\mu^3 m^2)O(μ3m2) for paths. Here, nnn represents the total number of vertices and mmm the number of edges. Our empirical studies, which examine the scaling behavior with respect to mmm and μ\muμ, complement these theoretical insights and suggest potential for further refinement of the runtime bounds.

View on arXiv
Comments on this paper