ResearchTrend.AI
  • Papers
  • Communities
  • Events
  • Blog
  • Pricing
Papers
Communities
Social Events
Terms and Conditions
Pricing
Parameter LabParameter LabTwitterGitHubLinkedInBlueskyYoutube

© 2025 ResearchTrend.AI, All rights reserved.

  1. Home
  2. Papers
  3. 2311.16872
46
2
v1v2v3 (latest)

A unified weighting framework for evaluating nearest neighbour classification

28 November 2023
O. Lenz
Henri Bollaert
Chris Cornelis
ArXiv (abs)PDFHTML
Abstract

We present the first comprehensive and large-scale evaluation of classical (NN), fuzzy (FNN) and fuzzy rough (FRNN) nearest neighbour classification. We standardise existing proposals for nearest neighbour weighting with kernel functions, applied to the distance values and/or ranks of the nearest neighbours of a test instance. In particular, we show that the theoretically optimal Samworth weights converge to a kernel. Kernel functions are closely related to fuzzy negation operators, and we propose a new kernel based on Yager negation. We also consider various distance and scaling measures, which we show can be related to each other. Through a systematic series of experiments on 85 real-life classification datasets, we find that NN, FNN and FRNN all perform best with Boscovich distance, and that NN and FRNN perform best with a combination of Samworth rank- and distance-weights and scaling by the mean absolute deviation around the median (r1r_1r1​), the standard deviation (r2r_2r2​) or the semi-interquartile range (r∞∗r_{\infty}^*r∞∗​), while FNN performs best with only Samworth distance-weights and r1r_1r1​- or r2r_2r2​-scaling. However, NN achieves comparable performance with Yager-12\frac{1}{2}21​ distance-weights, which are simpler to implement than a combination of Samworth distance- and rank-weights. Finally, FRNN generally outperforms NN, which in turn performs systematically better than FNN.

View on arXiv
@article{lenz2025_2311.16872,
  title={ A unified weighting framework for evaluating nearest neighbour classification },
  author={ Oliver Urs Lenz and Henri Bollaert and Chris Cornelis },
  journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.16872},
  year={ 2025 }
}
Comments on this paper