In-context learning (ICL) has shown impressive results in few-shot learning tasks, yet its underlying mechanism is still not fully understood. Recent works suggest that ICL can be thought of as a gradient descent (GD) based optimization process. While promising, these results mainly focus on simplified settings of ICL and provide only a preliminary evaluation of the similarities between the two methods. In this work, we revisit the comparison between ICL and GD-based finetuning and study what properties of ICL an equivalent process must follow. We highlight a major difference in the flow of information between ICL and standard finetuning. Namely, ICL can only rely on information from lower layers at every point, while finetuning depends on loss gradients from deeper layers. We refer to this discrepancy as Layer Causality and show that a layer causal variant of the finetuning process aligns with ICL on par with vanilla finetuning and is even better in most cases across relevant metrics. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first work to discuss this discrepancy explicitly and suggest a solution that tackles this problem with minimal changes.
View on arXiv