ChatGPT is a powerful language model from OpenAI that is arguably able to comprehend and generate text. ChatGPT is expected to have a large impact on society, research, and education. An essential step to understand ChatGPT's expected impact is to study its domain-specific answering capabilities. Here, we perform a systematic empirical assessment of its abilities to answer questions across the natural science and engineering domains. We collected 594 questions from 198 faculty members across 5 faculties at Delft University of Technology. After collecting the answers from ChatGPT, the participants assessed the quality of the answers using a systematic scheme. Our results show that the answers from ChatGPT are on average perceived as ``mostly correct''. Two major trends are that the rating of the ChatGPT answers significantly decreases (i) as the complexity level of the question increases and (ii) as we evaluate skills beyond scientific knowledge, e.g., critical attitude.
View on arXiv