Training deep neural networks (DNNs) used in modern machine learning is computationally expensive. Machine learning scientists, therefore, rely on stochastic first-order methods for training, coupled with significant hand-tuning, to obtain good performance. To better understand performance variability of different stochastic algorithms, including second-order methods, we conduct an empirical study that treats performance as a response variable across multiple training sessions of the same model. Using 2-factor Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) with interactions, we show that batch size used during training has a statistically significant effect on the peak accuracy of the methods, and that full batch largely performed the worst. In addition, we found that second-order optimizers (SOOs) generally exhibited significantly lower variance at specific batch sizes, suggesting they may require less hyperparameter tuning, leading to a reduced overall time to solution for model training.
View on arXiv