Due to the complexity of many decision making problems, tree search algorithms often have inadequate information to produce accurate transition models. Robust methods, designed to make safe decisions when faced with these uncertainties, often overlook the impact expressions of uncertainty have on how the decision is made. This work introduces the Ambiguity Attitude Graph Search (AAGS), advocating for more precise representation of ambiguities (uncertainty from a set of plausible models) in decision making. Additionally, AAGS allows users to adjust their ambiguity attitude (or preference), promoting exploration and improving users' ability to control how an agent should respond when faced with a set of valid alternatives. Simulation in a dynamic sailing environment shows how highly stochastic environments can lead robust methods to fail. Results further demonstrate how adjusting ambiguity attitudes better fulfills objectives while mitigating this failure mode of robust approaches. Because this approach is a generalization of the robust framework, these results further demonstrate how algorithms focused on ambiguity have applicability beyond safety-critical systems.
View on arXiv