ResearchTrend.AI
  • Papers
  • Communities
  • Events
  • Blog
  • Pricing
Papers
Communities
Social Events
Terms and Conditions
Pricing
Parameter LabParameter LabTwitterGitHubLinkedInBlueskyYoutube

© 2025 ResearchTrend.AI, All rights reserved.

  1. Home
  2. Papers
  3. 2302.10301
19
5

Artificial Intelligence System for Detection and Screening of Cardiac Abnormalities using Electrocardiogram Images

10 February 2023
Deyun Zhang
Shijia Geng
Yang Zhou
Wei-Zhao Xu
Guodong Wei
Kai Wang
Jie Yu
Qiuyu Zhu
Yongkui Li
Yonghong Zhao
Xing-rong Chen
Rui Zhang
Zhaoji Fu
Rongbo Zhou
E. Yanqi
Sumei Fan
Qinghao Zhao
Chuandong Cheng
Nan Peng
Liangliang Zhang
Linlin Zheng
Jianjun Chu
Hongbin Xu
C. Tan
Jian-wei Liu
Hua-Yue Tao
Tong Liu
Kangyin Chen
Chenyang Jiang
Xingpeng Liu
linda Qiao
ArXivPDFHTML
Abstract

The artificial intelligence (AI) system has achieved expert-level performance in electrocardiogram (ECG) signal analysis. However, in underdeveloped countries or regions where the healthcare information system is imperfect, only paper ECGs can be provided. Analysis of real-world ECG images (photos or scans of paper ECGs) remains challenging due to complex environments or interference. In this study, we present an AI system developed to detect and screen cardiac abnormalities (CAs) from real-world ECG images. The system was evaluated on a large dataset of 52,357 patients from multiple regions and populations across the world. On the detection task, the AI system obtained area under the receiver operating curve (AUC) of 0.996 (hold-out test), 0.994 (external test 1), 0.984 (external test 2), and 0.979 (external test 3), respectively. Meanwhile, the detection results of AI system showed a strong correlation with the diagnosis of cardiologists (cardiologist 1 (R=0.794, p<1e-3), cardiologist 2 (R=0.812, p<1e-3)). On the screening task, the AI system achieved AUCs of 0.894 (hold-out test) and 0.850 (external test). The screening performance of the AI system was better than that of the cardiologists (AI system (0.846) vs. cardiologist 1 (0.520) vs. cardiologist 2 (0.480)). Our study demonstrates the feasibility of an accurate, objective, easy-to-use, fast, and low-cost AI system for CA detection and screening. The system has the potential to be used by healthcare professionals, caregivers, and general users to assess CAs based on real-world ECG images.

View on arXiv
Comments on this paper