ResearchTrend.AI
  • Papers
  • Communities
  • Events
  • Blog
  • Pricing
Papers
Communities
Social Events
Terms and Conditions
Pricing
Parameter LabParameter LabTwitterGitHubLinkedInBlueskyYoutube

© 2025 ResearchTrend.AI, All rights reserved.

  1. Home
  2. Papers
  3. 2301.09338
94
2
v1v2 (latest)

Employing similarity to highlight differences: On the impact of anatomical assumptions in chest X-ray registration methods

23 January 2023
Astrid Berg
E. Vandersmissen
M. Wimmer
David Major
Theresa Neubauer
Dimitrios Lenis
J. Cant
A. Snoeckx
Katja Bühler
ArXiv (abs)PDFHTML
Abstract

To facilitate both the detection and the interpretation of findings in chest X-rays, comparison with a previous image of the same patient is very valuable to radiologists. Today, the most common approach for deep learning methods to automatically inspect chest X-rays disregards the patient history and classifies only single images as normal or abnormal. Nevertheless, several methods for assisting in the task of comparison through image registration have been proposed in the past. However, as we illustrate, they tend to miss specific types of pathological changes like cardiomegaly and effusion. Due to assumptions on fixed anatomical structures or their measurements of registration quality they tend to produce unnaturally deformed warp fields impacting visualization of the difference image between moving and fixed images. To overcome these limitations, we are the first to use a new paradigm based on individual rib pair segmentation for anatomy penalized registration, which proves a natural way to limit folding of the warp field, especially beneficial for image pairs with large pathological changes. We show that it is possible to develop a deep learning powered solution that can visualize what other methods overlook on a large data set of paired public images, starting from less than 25 fully labeled and 50 partly labeled training images, employing sequential instance memory segmentation with hole dropout, weak labeling, coarse-to-fine refinement and Gaussian mixture model histogram matching. We statistically evaluate the benefits of our method over the SOTA and highlight the limits of currently used metrics for registration of chest X-rays.

View on arXiv
Comments on this paper