ResearchTrend.AI
  • Papers
  • Communities
  • Events
  • Blog
  • Pricing
Papers
Communities
Social Events
Terms and Conditions
Pricing
Parameter LabParameter LabTwitterGitHubLinkedInBlueskyYoutube

© 2025 ResearchTrend.AI, All rights reserved.

  1. Home
  2. Papers
  3. 2208.00956
15
5

An adjoint-free algorithm for conditional nonlinear optimal perturbations (CNOPs) via sampling

1 August 2022
Bin Shi
Guodong Sun
ArXivPDFHTML
Abstract

In this paper, we propose a sampling algorithm based on state-of-the-art statistical machine learning techniques to obtain conditional nonlinear optimal perturbations (CNOPs), which is different from traditional (deterministic) optimization methods.1 Specifically, the traditional approach is unavailable in practice, which requires numerically computing the gradient (first-order information) such that the computation cost is expensive, since it needs a large number of times to run numerical models. However, the sampling approach directly reduces the gradient to the objective function value (zeroth-order information), which also avoids using the adjoint technique that is unusable for many atmosphere and ocean models and requires large amounts of storage. We show an intuitive analysis for the sampling algorithm from the law of large numbers and further present a Chernoff-type concentration inequality to rigorously characterize the degree to which the sample average probabilistically approximates the exact gradient. The experiments are implemented to obtain the CNOPs for two numerical models, the Burgers equation with small viscosity and the Lorenz-96 model. We demonstrate the CNOPs obtained with their spatial patterns, objective values, computation times, and nonlinear error growth. Compared with the performance of the three approaches, all the characters for quantifying the CNOPs are nearly consistent, while the computation time using the sampling approach with fewer samples is much shorter. In other words, the new sampling algorithm shortens the computation time to the utmost at the cost of losing little accuracy.

View on arXiv
Comments on this paper