ResearchTrend.AI
  • Papers
  • Communities
  • Events
  • Blog
  • Pricing
Papers
Communities
Social Events
Terms and Conditions
Pricing
Parameter LabParameter LabTwitterGitHubLinkedInBlueskyYoutube

© 2025 ResearchTrend.AI, All rights reserved.

  1. Home
  2. Papers
  3. 2207.13848
17
0

Predicting the Output Structure of Sparse Matrix Multiplication with Sampled Compression Ratio

28 July 2022
Zhaoyang Du
Yijin Guan
Tianchan Guan
Dimin Niu
N. Tan
Xiaopeng Yu
Hongzhong Zheng
J. Meng
Xiaolang Yan
Yuan Xie
ArXivPDFHTML
Abstract

Sparse general matrix multiplication (SpGEMM) is a fundamental building block in numerous scientific applications. One critical task of SpGEMM is to compute or predict the structure of the output matrix (i.e., the number of nonzero elements per output row) for efficient memory allocation and load balance, which impact the overall performance of SpGEMM. Existing work either precisely calculates the output structure or adopts upper-bound or sampling-based methods to predict the output structure. However, these methods either take much execution time or are not accurate enough. In this paper, we propose a novel sampling-based method with better accuracy and low costs compared to the existing sampling-based method. The proposed method first predicts the compression ratio of SpGEMM by leveraging the number of intermediate products (denoted as FLOP) and the number of nonzero elements (denoted as NNZ) of the same sampled result matrix. And then, the predicted output structure is obtained by dividing the FLOP per output row by the predicted compression ratio. We also propose a reference design of the existing sampling-based method with optimized computing overheads to demonstrate the better accuracy of the proposed method. We construct 625 test cases with various matrix dimensions and sparse structures to evaluate the prediction accuracy. Experimental results show that the absolute relative errors of the proposed method and the reference design are 1.56\% and 8.12\%, respectively, on average, and 25\% and 156\%, respectively, in the worst case.

View on arXiv
Comments on this paper