ResearchTrend.AI
  • Papers
  • Communities
  • Events
  • Blog
  • Pricing
Papers
Communities
Social Events
Terms and Conditions
Pricing
Parameter LabParameter LabTwitterGitHubLinkedInBlueskyYoutube

© 2025 ResearchTrend.AI, All rights reserved.

  1. Home
  2. Papers
  3. 2102.00292
20
1

Epistocracy Algorithm: A Novel Hyper-heuristic Optimization Strategy for Solving Complex Optimization Problems

30 January 2021
Seyed Ziae Mousavi Mojab
Seyedmohammad Shams
H. Soltanian-Zadeh
F. Fotouhi
ArXivPDFHTML
Abstract

This paper proposes a novel evolutionary algorithm called Epistocracy which incorporates human socio-political behavior and intelligence to solve complex optimization problems. The inspiration of the Epistocracy algorithm originates from a political regime where educated people have more voting power than the uneducated or less educated. The algorithm is a self-adaptive, and multi-population optimizer in which the evolution process takes place in parallel for many populations led by a council of leaders. To avoid stagnation in poor local optima and to prevent a premature convergence, the algorithm employs multiple mechanisms such as dynamic and adaptive leadership based on gravitational force, dynamic population allocation and diversification, variance-based step-size determination, and regression-based leadership adjustment. The algorithm uses a stratified sampling method called Latin Hypercube Sampling (LHS) to distribute the initial population more evenly for exploration of the search space and exploitation of the accumulated knowledge. To investigate the performance and evaluate the reliability of the algorithm, we have used a set of multimodal benchmark functions, and then applied the algorithm to the MNIST dataset to further verify the accuracy, scalability, and robustness of the algorithm. Experimental results show that the Epistocracy algorithm outperforms the tested state-of-the-art evolutionary and swarm intelligence algorithms in terms of performance, precision, and convergence.

View on arXiv
Comments on this paper