ResearchTrend.AI
  • Papers
  • Communities
  • Events
  • Blog
  • Pricing
Papers
Communities
Social Events
Terms and Conditions
Pricing
Parameter LabParameter LabTwitterGitHubLinkedInBlueskyYoutube

© 2025 ResearchTrend.AI, All rights reserved.

  1. Home
  2. Papers
  3. 2011.02466
49
29

Algorithms and Hardness for Linear Algebra on Geometric Graphs

4 November 2020
Josh Alman
T. Chu
Aaron Schild
Zhao-quan Song
ArXivPDFHTML
Abstract

For a function K:Rd×Rd→R≥0\mathsf{K} : \mathbb{R}^{d} \times \mathbb{R}^{d} \to \mathbb{R}_{\geq 0}K:Rd×Rd→R≥0​, and a set P={x1,…,xn}⊂RdP = \{ x_1, \ldots, x_n\} \subset \mathbb{R}^dP={x1​,…,xn​}⊂Rd of nnn points, the K\mathsf{K}K graph GPG_PGP​ of PPP is the complete graph on nnn nodes where the weight between nodes iii and jjj is given by K(xi,xj)\mathsf{K}(x_i, x_j)K(xi​,xj​). In this paper, we initiate the study of when efficient spectral graph theory is possible on these graphs. We investigate whether or not it is possible to solve the following problems in n1+o(1)n^{1+o(1)}n1+o(1) time for a K\mathsf{K}K-graph GPG_PGP​ when d<no(1)d < n^{o(1)}d<no(1): ∙\bullet∙ Multiply a given vector by the adjacency matrix or Laplacian matrix of GPG_PGP​ ∙\bullet∙ Find a spectral sparsifier of GPG_PGP​ ∙\bullet∙ Solve a Laplacian system in GPG_PGP​'s Laplacian matrix For each of these problems, we consider all functions of the form K(u,v)=f(∥u−v∥22)\mathsf{K}(u,v) = f(\|u-v\|_2^2)K(u,v)=f(∥u−v∥22​) for a function f:R→Rf:\mathbb{R} \rightarrow \mathbb{R}f:R→R. We provide algorithms and comparable hardness results for many such K\mathsf{K}K, including the Gaussian kernel, Neural tangent kernels, and more. For example, in dimension d=Ω(log⁡n)d = \Omega(\log n)d=Ω(logn), we show that there is a parameter associated with the function fff for which low parameter values imply n1+o(1)n^{1+o(1)}n1+o(1) time algorithms for all three of these problems and high parameter values imply the nonexistence of subquadratic time algorithms assuming Strong Exponential Time Hypothesis (SETH\mathsf{SETH}SETH), given natural assumptions on fff. As part of our results, we also show that the exponential dependence on the dimension ddd in the celebrated fast multipole method of Greengard and Rokhlin cannot be improved, assuming SETH\mathsf{SETH}SETH, for a broad class of functions fff. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first formal limitation proven about fast multipole methods.

View on arXiv
Comments on this paper