ResearchTrend.AI
  • Papers
  • Communities
  • Events
  • Blog
  • Pricing
Papers
Communities
Social Events
Terms and Conditions
Pricing
Parameter LabParameter LabTwitterGitHubLinkedInBlueskyYoutube

© 2025 ResearchTrend.AI, All rights reserved.

  1. Home
  2. Papers
  3. 2011.01689
8
75

Improved unsupervised physics-informed deep learning for intravoxel incoherent motion modeling and evaluation in pancreatic cancer patients

3 November 2020
Misha P. T. Kaandorp
S. Barbieri
R. Klaassen
H. Laarhoven
H. Crezee
P. T. While
A. Nederveen
O. Gurney-Champion
ArXivPDFHTML
Abstract

Purpose{\bf Purpose}Purpose: Earlier work showed that IVIM-NETorig_{orig}orig​, an unsupervised physics-informed deep neural network, was more accurate than other state-of-the-art intravoxel-incoherent motion (IVIM) fitting approaches to DWI. This study presents an improved version: IVIM-NEToptim_{optim}optim​, and characterizes its superior performance in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) patients. Method{\bf Method}Method: In simulations (SNR=20), the accuracy, independence and consistency of IVIM-NET were evaluated for combinations of hyperparameters (fit S0, constraints, network architecture, # hidden layers, dropout, batch normalization, learning rate), by calculating the NRMSE, Spearman's ρ\rhoρ, and the coefficient of variation (CVNET_{NET}NET​), respectively. The best performing network, IVIM-NEToptim_{optim}optim​ was compared to least squares (LS) and a Bayesian approach at different SNRs. IVIM-NEToptim_{optim}optim​'s performance was evaluated in 23 PDAC patients. 14 of the patients received no treatment between scan sessions and 9 received chemoradiotherapy between sessions. Intersession within-subject standard deviations (wSD) and treatment-induced changes were assessed. Results{\bf Results}Results: In simulations, IVIM-NEToptim_{optim}optim​ outperformed IVIM-NETorig_{orig}orig​ in accuracy (NRMSE(D)=0.18 vs 0.20; NMRSE(f)=0.22 vs 0.27; NMRSE(D*)=0.39 vs 0.39), independence (ρ\rhoρ(D*,f)=0.22 vs 0.74) and consistency (CVNET_{NET}NET​ (D)=0.01 vs 0.10; CVNET_{NET}NET​ (f)=0.02 vs 0.05; CVNET_{NET}NET​ (D*)=0.04 vs 0.11). IVIM-NEToptim_{optim}optim​ showed superior performance to the LS and Bayesian approaches at SNRs<50. In vivo, IVIM-NEToptim_{optim}optim​ sshowed significantly less noisy parameter maps with lower wSD for D and f than the alternatives. In the treated cohort, IVIM-NEToptim_{optim}optim​ detected the most individual patients with significant parameter changes compared to day-to-day variations. Conclusion{\bf Conclusion}Conclusion: IVIM-NEToptim_{optim}optim​ is recommended for IVIM fitting to DWI data.

View on arXiv
Comments on this paper