ResearchTrend.AI
  • Papers
  • Communities
  • Events
  • Blog
  • Pricing
Papers
Communities
Social Events
Terms and Conditions
Pricing
Parameter LabParameter LabTwitterGitHubLinkedInBlueskyYoutube

© 2025 ResearchTrend.AI, All rights reserved.

  1. Home
  2. Papers
  3. 2006.07541
11
15

Follow the Perturbed Leader: Optimism and Fast Parallel Algorithms for Smooth Minimax Games

13 June 2020
A. Suggala
Praneeth Netrapalli
ArXivPDFHTML
Abstract

We consider the problem of online learning and its application to solving minimax games. For the online learning problem, Follow the Perturbed Leader (FTPL) is a widely studied algorithm which enjoys the optimal O(T1/2)O(T^{1/2})O(T1/2) worst-case regret guarantee for both convex and nonconvex losses. In this work, we show that when the sequence of loss functions is predictable, a simple modification of FTPL which incorporates optimism can achieve better regret guarantees, while retaining the optimal worst-case regret guarantee for unpredictable sequences. A key challenge in obtaining these tighter regret bounds is the stochasticity and optimism in the algorithm, which requires different analysis techniques than those commonly used in the analysis of FTPL. The key ingredient we utilize in our analysis is the dual view of perturbation as regularization. While our algorithm has several applications, we consider the specific application of minimax games. For solving smooth convex-concave games, our algorithm only requires access to a linear optimization oracle. For Lipschitz and smooth nonconvex-nonconcave games, our algorithm requires access to an optimization oracle which computes the perturbed best response. In both these settings, our algorithm solves the game up to an accuracy of O(T−1/2)O(T^{-1/2})O(T−1/2) using TTT calls to the optimization oracle. An important feature of our algorithm is that it is highly parallelizable and requires only O(T1/2)O(T^{1/2})O(T1/2) iterations, with each iteration making O(T1/2)O(T^{1/2})O(T1/2) parallel calls to the optimization oracle.

View on arXiv
Comments on this paper