18
15

Approximability of Monotone Submodular Function Maximization under Cardinality and Matroid Constraints in the Streaming Model

Abstract

Maximizing a monotone submodular function under various constraints is a classical and intensively studied problem. However, in the single-pass streaming model, where the elements arrive one by one and an algorithm can store only a small fraction of input elements, there is much gap in our knowledge, even though several approximation algorithms have been proposed in the literature. In this work, we present the first lower bound on the approximation ratios for cardinality and matroid constraints that beat 11e1-\frac{1}{e} in the single-pass streaming model. Let nn be the number of elements in the stream. Then, we prove that any (randomized) streaming algorithm for a cardinality constraint with approximation ratio 22+2+ε\frac{2}{2+\sqrt{2}}+\varepsilon requires Ω(nK2)\Omega\left(\frac{n}{K^2}\right) space for any ε>0\varepsilon>0, where KK is the size limit of the output set. We also prove that any (randomized) streaming algorithm for a (partition) matroid constraint with approximation ratio K2K1+ε\frac{K}{2K-1}+\varepsilon requires Ω(nK)\Omega\left(\frac{n}{K}\right) space for any ε>0\varepsilon>0, where KK is the rank of the given matroid. In addition, we give streaming algorithms when we only have a weak oracle with which we can only evaluate function values on feasible sets. Specifically, we show weak-oracle streaming algorithms for cardinality and matroid constraints with approximation ratios K2K1\frac{K}{2K-1} and 12\frac{1}{2}, respectively, whose space complexity is exponential in KK but is independent of nn. The former one exactly matches the known inapproximability result for a cardinality constraint in the weak oracle model. The latter one almost matches our lower bound of K2K1\frac{K}{2K-1} for a matroid constraint, which almost settles the approximation ratio for a matroid constraint that can be obtained by a streaming algorithm whose space complexity is independent of nn.

View on arXiv
Comments on this paper