32
1
v1v2 (latest)

Understanding Limitation of Two Symmetrized Orders by Worst-case Complexity

Abstract

Update order is one of the major design choices of block decomposition algorithms. There are at least two classes of deterministic update orders: nonsymmetric (e.g. cyclic order) and symmetric (e.g. Gaussian back substitution or symmetric Gauss-Seidel). Recently, Coordinate Descent (CD) with cyclic order was shown to be O(n2)O(n^2) times slower than randomized versions in the worst-case. A natural question arises: can the symmetrized orders achieve faster convergence rates than the cyclic order, or even getting close to the randomized versions? In this paper, we give a negative answer to this question. We show that both Gaussian back substitution (GBS) and symmetric Gauss-Seidel (sGS) suffer from the same slow convergence issue as the cyclic order in the worst case. In particular, we prove that for unconstrained problems, both GBS-CD and sGS-CD can be O(n2)O(n^2) times slower than R-CD. Despite unconstrained problems, we also empirically study linearly constrained problems with quadratic objective: we empirically demonstrate that the convergence speed of GBS-ADMM and sGS-ADMM can be roughly O(n2)O(n^2) times slower than randomly permuted ADMM.

View on arXiv
Comments on this paper

We use cookies and other tracking technologies to improve your browsing experience on our website, to show you personalized content and targeted ads, to analyze our website traffic, and to understand where our visitors are coming from. See our policy.