ResearchTrend.AI
  • Papers
  • Communities
  • Events
  • Blog
  • Pricing
Papers
Communities
Social Events
Terms and Conditions
Pricing
Parameter LabParameter LabTwitterGitHubLinkedInBlueskyYoutube

© 2025 ResearchTrend.AI, All rights reserved.

  1. Home
  2. Papers
  3. 1812.10917
11
52

The Power of Distributed Verifiers in Interactive Proofs

28 December 2018
M. Naor
M. Parter
E. Yogev
ArXivPDFHTML
Abstract

We explore the power of interactive proofs with a distributed verifier. In this setting, the verifier consists of nnn nodes and a graph GGG that defines their communication pattern. The prover is a single entity that communicates with all nodes by short messages. The goal is to verify that the graph GGG belongs to some language in a small number of rounds, and with small communication bound, i.e., the proof size. This interactive model was introduced by Kol, Oshman and Saxena (PODC 2018) as a generalization of non-interactive distributed proofs. They demonstrated the power of interaction in this setting by constructing protocols for problems as Graph Symmetry and Graph Non-Isomorphism -- both of which require proofs of Ω(n2)\Omega(n^2)Ω(n2)-bits without interaction. In this work, we provide a new general framework for distributed interactive proofs that allows one to translate standard interactive protocols to ones where the verifier is distributed with short proof size. We show the following: * Every (centralized) computation that can be performed in time O(n)O(n)O(n) can be translated into three-round distributed interactive protocol with O(log⁡n)O(\log n)O(logn) proof size. This implies that many graph problems for sparse graphs have succinct proofs. * Every (centralized) computation implemented by either a small space or by uniform NC circuit can be translated into a distributed protocol with O(1)O(1)O(1) rounds and O(log⁡n)O(\log n)O(logn) bits proof size for the low space case and polylog(n)polylog(n)polylog(n) many rounds and proof size for NC. * We show that for Graph Non-Isomorphism, there is a 4-round protocol with O(log⁡n)O(\log n)O(logn) proof size, improving upon the O(nlog⁡n)O(n \log n)O(nlogn) proof size of Kol et al. * For many problems we show how to reduce proof size below the naturally seeming barrier of log⁡n\log nlogn. We get a 5-round protocols with proof size O(log⁡log⁡n)O(\log \log n)O(loglogn) for a family of problems.

View on arXiv
Comments on this paper