ResearchTrend.AI
  • Papers
  • Communities
  • Events
  • Blog
  • Pricing
Papers
Communities
Social Events
Terms and Conditions
Pricing
Parameter LabParameter LabTwitterGitHubLinkedInBlueskyYoutube

© 2025 ResearchTrend.AI, All rights reserved.

  1. Home
  2. Papers
  3. 1811.05124
46
16
v1v2v3v4 (latest)

Fundamental Limits of Exact Support Recovery in High Dimensions

13 November 2018
Zhengyuan Gao
Stilian A. Stoev
ArXiv (abs)PDFHTML
Abstract

We study the support recovery problem for a high-dimensional signal observed with additive noise. With suitable parametrization of the signal sparsity and magnitude of its non-zero components, we characterize a phase-transition phenomenon akin to the signal detection problem studied by Ingster in 1998. Specifically, if the signal magnitude is above the so-called strong classification boundary, we show that several classes of well-known procedures achieve asymptotically perfect support recovery as the dimension goes to infinity. This is so, for a very broad class of error distributions with light, rapidly varying tails which may have arbitrary dependence. Conversely, if the signal is below the boundary, then for a very broad class of error dependence structures, no thresholding estimators (including ones with data-dependent thresholds) can achieve perfect support recovery. The proofs of these results exploit a certain concentration of maxima phenomenon known as relative stability. We provide a complete characterization of the relative stability phenomenon for Gaussian triangular arrays in terms their correlation structure. The proof uses classic Sudakov-Fernique and Slepian lemma arguments along with a curious application of Ramsey's coloring theorem. We note that our study of the strong classification boundary is in a finer, point-wise, rather than minimax, sense. We also establish the Bayes optimality and sub-optimality of thresholding procedures. Consequently, we obtain a minimax-type characterization of the strong classification boundary for errors with log-concave densities.

View on arXiv
Comments on this paper