ResearchTrend.AI
  • Papers
  • Communities
  • Events
  • Blog
  • Pricing
Papers
Communities
Social Events
Terms and Conditions
Pricing
Parameter LabParameter LabTwitterGitHubLinkedInBlueskyYoutube

© 2025 ResearchTrend.AI, All rights reserved.

  1. Home
  2. Papers
  3. 1808.02545
32
14
v1v2 (latest)

Persistent Monitoring of Dynamically Changing Environments Using an Unmanned Vehicle

7 August 2018
S. K. K. Hari
Sivakumar Rathinam
S. Darbha
K. Krishnamoorthy
S. Manyam
D. Casbeer
ArXiv (abs)PDFHTML
Abstract

We consider the problem of planning a closed walk W\mathcal WW for a UAV to persistently monitor a finite number of stationary targets with equal priorities and dynamically changing properties. A UAV must physically visit the targets in order to monitor them and collect information therein. The frequency of monitoring any given target is specified by a target revisit time, i.e.i.e.i.e., the maximum allowable time between any two successive visits to the target. The problem considered in this paper is the following: Given nnn targets and k≥nk \geq nk≥n allowed visits to them, find an optimal closed walk W∗(k)\mathcal W^*(k)W∗(k) so that every target is visited at least once and the maximum revisit time over all the targets, R(W(k))\mathcal R(\mathcal W(k))R(W(k)), is minimized. We prove the following: If k≥n2−nk \geq n^2-nk≥n2−n, R(W∗(k))\mathcal R(\mathcal W^*(k))R(W∗(k)) (or simply, R∗(k)\mathcal R^*(k)R∗(k)) takes only two values: R∗(n)\mathcal R^*(n)R∗(n) when kkk is an integral multiple of nnn, and R∗(n+1)\mathcal R^*(n+1)R∗(n+1) otherwise. This result suggests significant computational savings - one only needs to determine W∗(n)\mathcal W^*(n)W∗(n) and W∗(n+1)\mathcal W^*(n+1)W∗(n+1) to construct an optimal solution W∗(k)\mathcal W^*(k)W∗(k). We provide MILP formulations for computing W∗(n)\mathcal W^*(n)W∗(n) and W∗(n+1)\mathcal W^*(n+1)W∗(n+1). Furthermore, for {\it any} given kkk, we prove that R∗(k)≥R∗(k+n)\mathcal R^*(k) \geq \mathcal R^*(k+n)R∗(k)≥R∗(k+n).

View on arXiv
Comments on this paper