ResearchTrend.AI
  • Papers
  • Communities
  • Events
  • Blog
  • Pricing
Papers
Communities
Social Events
Terms and Conditions
Pricing
Parameter LabParameter LabTwitterGitHubLinkedInBlueskyYoutube

© 2025 ResearchTrend.AI, All rights reserved.

  1. Home
  2. Papers
  3. 1804.07661
60
138
v1v2 (latest)

Super-resolution Ultrasound Localization Microscopy through Deep Learning

20 April 2018
Ruud J. G. van Sloun
Oren Solomon
M. Bruce
Zin Z. Khaing
H. Wijkstra
Yonina C. Eldar
M. Mischi
ArXiv (abs)PDFHTML
Abstract

Ultrasound localization microscopy has enabled super-resolution vascular imaging in laboratory environments through precise localization of individual ultrasound contrast agents across numerous imaging frames. However, analysis of high-density regions with significant overlaps among the agents' point spread responses yields high localization errors, constraining the technique to low-concentration conditions. As such, long acquisition times are required to sufficiently cover the vascular bed. In this work, we present a fast and precise method for obtaining super-resolution vascular images from high-density contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging data. This method, which we term Deep Ultrasound Localization Microscopy (Deep-ULM), exploits modern deep learning strategies and employs a convolutional neural network to perform localization microscopy in dense scenarios. This end-to-end fully convolutional neural network architecture is trained effectively using on-line synthesized data, enabling robust inference in-vivo under a wide variety of imaging conditions. We show that deep learning attains super-resolution with challenging contrast-agent concentrations (microbubble densities), both in-silico as well as in-vivo, as we go from ultrasound scans of a rodent spinal cord in an experimental setting to standard clinically-acquired recordings in a human prostate. Deep-ULM achieves high quality sub-diffraction recovery, and is suitable for real-time applications, resolving about 135 high-resolution 64x64-patches per second on a standard PC. Exploiting GPU computation, this number increases to 2500 patches per second.

View on arXiv
Comments on this paper