Estimating the number of unseen species: A bird in the hand is worth $\log n$ in the bush

Estimating the number of unseen species is an important problem in many scientific endeavors. Its most popular formulation, introduced by Fisher, uses $n$ samples to predict the number $U$ of hitherto unseen species that would be observed if $t\cdot n$ new samples were collected. Of considerable interest is the largest ratio $t$ between the number of new and existing samples for which $U$ can be accurately predicted. In seminal works, Good and Toulmin constructed an intriguing estimator that predicts $U$ for all $t\le 1$, thereby showing that the number of species can be estimated for a population twice as large as that observed. Subsequently Efron and Thisted obtained a modified estimator that empirically predicts $U$ even for some $t>1$, but without provable guarantees. We derive a class of estimators that $\textit{provably}$ predict $U$ not just for constant $t>1$, but all the way up to $t$ proportional to $\log n$. This shows that the number of species can be estimated for a population $\log n$ times larger than that observed, a factor that grows arbitrarily large as $n$ increases. We also show that this range is the best possible and that the estimators' mean-square error is optimal up to constants for any $t$. Our approach yields the first provable guarantee for the Efron-Thisted estimator and, in addition, a variant which achieves stronger theoretical and experimental performance than existing methodologies on a variety of synthetic and real datasets. The estimators we derive are simple linear estimators that are computable in time proportional to $n$. The performance guarantees hold uniformly for all distributions, and apply to all four standard sampling models commonly used across various scientific disciplines: multinomial, Poisson, hypergeometric, and Bernoulli product.