ResearchTrend.AI
  • Papers
  • Communities
  • Events
  • Blog
  • Pricing
Papers
Communities
Social Events
Terms and Conditions
Pricing
Parameter LabParameter LabTwitterGitHubLinkedInBlueskyYoutube

© 2025 ResearchTrend.AI, All rights reserved.

  1. Home
  2. Papers
  3. 1307.4953
60
72

Computing exact DDD-optimal designs by mixed integer second-order cone programming

18 July 2013
G. Sagnol
Radoslav Harman
ArXivPDFHTML
Abstract

Let the design of an experiment be represented by an sss-dimensional vector w\mathbf {w}w of weights with nonnegative components. Let the quality of w\mathbf {w}w for the estimation of the parameters of the statistical model be measured by the criterion of DDD-optimality, defined as the mmmth root of the determinant of the information matrix M(w)=∑i=1swiAiAiTM(\mathbf {w})=\sum_{i=1}^sw_iA_iA_i^TM(w)=∑i=1s​wi​Ai​AiT​, where Ai,i=1,…,sA_i,i=1,\ldots,sAi​,i=1,…,s are known matrices with mmm rows. In this paper, we show that the criterion of DDD-optimality is second-order cone representable. As a result, the method of second-order cone programming can be used to compute an approximate DDD-optimal design with any system of linear constraints on the vector of weights. More importantly, the proposed characterization allows us to compute an exact DDD-optimal design, which is possible thanks to high-quality branch-and-cut solvers specialized to solve mixed integer second-order cone programming problems. Our results extend to the case of the criterion of DKD_KDK​-optimality, which measures the quality of w\mathbf {w}w for the estimation of a linear parameter subsystem defined by a full-rank coefficient matrix KKK. We prove that some other widely used criteria are also second-order cone representable, for instance, the criteria of AAA-, AKA_KAK​-, GGG- and III-optimality. We present several numerical examples demonstrating the efficiency and general applicability of the proposed method. We show that in many cases the mixed integer second-order cone programming approach allows us to find a provably optimal exact design, while the standard heuristics systematically miss the optimum.

View on arXiv
Comments on this paper